Lynn Greenky is associate teaching professor at Syracuse University in the Department of Communication and Rhetorical Studies. Ten years ago, she began teaching what has become a beloved undergraduate course about the First Amendment. Her educational background gave her a unique perspective upon which to build a course about the protection provided—and not provided—to Americans by the First Amendment.
Lynn Greenky, an emeritus professor at Syracuse University, agrees that Reed v. Town of Gilbert probably protects the Holders' message. She was trained as a lawyer and wrote the book When Freedom Speaks: The Boundaries and the Boundlessness of our First Amendment Right. She says, "Any attempt to limit the expression of the Holders' political speech by the Winnebago County building and zoning department is unconstitutional unless the zoning department can provide evidence that it has a compelling interest within its governmental powers to restrict the speech and the means it uses to assert that power is narrowly tailored to achieve that purpose." @https://roscoenews.com/g/roscoe-il/n/269008/roscoe-resident-allowed-keep-large-political-paver-message-yard
Let’s be clear: There is no constitutional right to cause harm, even when one is engaging in political speech. When speech is used as a weapon to terrorize, incite violence or undermine democratic principles, it can be stopped and even punished.
Florida and Texas sought to prevent social media companies from deciding which posts can be promoted, demoted or blocked. The Supreme Court said the tech companies can moderate as they please.